On War and Dispute

                                                        On War and Dispute

Any conflict between two nations is picked up by social media in a big way and viewed from many dimensions. In fact, the effect of these social media outreach creates even an economic disturbance in pricing of products on a global sphere.

Internet describes war as a state of armed conflict between different countries or different groups within a country.

Internet defines conflict as a serious disagreement or argument, typically lasting for a long time or longer than expected period.

Internet defines fight as a violent struggle involving the exchange of physical blows or the use of weapons.

Internet defines dispute as a disagreement or argument on views or actions.

It is necessary to study which of these conflicts turn into a war and which are the ones that remain as a dispute. Many nations participate by taking sides when there is a conflict between two countries. This participation when mobilized with weapons or sanctions triggers a much more complex situation.

When two nations sharing a common border have conflict between them then it is significantly evident that they have dispute between them. When conditions of tolerance are overstepped, they get into a fight. These fights may happen over a period as and when the tolerance equation is put to distress.

With too much advancement in weapon systems all nations have procession or access to weapon either directly or indirectly. It will be wise to think more than once before taking sides between two sides in fight over any dispute.

In the present context any fight arising due to dispute between two nations if exceeding for more than three full Moon period is not a war. When two nations keep fighting for more than a three full moon period simply indicate there is a dispute between them; others can step back from taking sides and allow the nations in dispute to sort it between them.